2006.08.23

Vox Hunt: That rules

Comments

Show us some rules.

20080823.01.jpg

This was in a beautiful, old, very large gothic church in New York City (which wasn’t St. Patrick’s). There were only five of us so i wasn’t worried, but I still don’t understand. I seem to remember a performance broke out soon thereafter — Mozart’s Requiem? Don’t recall, exactly, this was 1996 — so it’s possible that at least one of the rules was being broken that night. But what’s a little fire hazard in the name of great music?


  • They have the same signs adorned on the cafeteria walls of NYC public high schools, I assure you..

  • sjon

    An on the inside there is probably another sign: Certified for 215 people?

  • Yep. If occupancy by 234 is dangerous an unlawful, 358 even moreso! There should be a third sign in the middle that says 1,000,000 people and replace "DANGEROUS" with "JUST PLAIN DUMB".

  • pastilla

    An age-old bitter rivalry between two elevator inspectors . . . or perhaps a clue to a murder mystery? "Someone put up the second sign . . . they wanted the elevator to be overloaded . . . but why?"

  • "...one of the rules was being broken..."

    The unsettling thing? That the broken rule was the one on the left. The right one was observed.

  • hee! :)

  • Jim

    Both signs can be true. They merely fail to establish a lower bound on legal occupancy.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Powered by
Movable Type 5.2
neonepiphany dot com